The problem

Liver metastases are followed by repeated CT scans, and how lesions change between scans informs every treatment review. That assessment is made by hand, varies between readers, and falls on a workforce that is already short.

Many patients, many scans.

Bowel cancer is the fourth most common cancer in the UK, and the liver is where it most often spreads.

48,213

new bowel cancer cases a year in the UK

Cancer Research UK, 2019 and 2021-2022
26.5%

developed liver metastases within five years, in a population study of 1,026 patients

Engstrand et al., BMC Cancer 2018 (Stockholm)
~12,800

people a year in the UK, if that rate applies here. Each is scanned every 2 to 3 months during treatment.

Our estimate from the two figures before it

Two readers, two answers.

Under the RECIST 1.1 rules, response is judged from the sum of the target lesions' diameters: a rise of at least 20% (and at least 5 mm) counts as progression, and a fall of at least 30% as partial response.

When two radiologists measure the change in the same single lesion, their answers can differ by up to about 30% either way (95% limits of agreement). Differences of that size can be enough to move an assessment across one of those lines.

How far two measurements of the same lesion can differ95% limits of agreement, pooled across 12 studies
Range within which two measurements of the same lesion differ, 95% limits of agreement-40%-30%-20%-10%0%+10%+20%+30%+40%Progression: 20% growthResponse: 30% shrinkageOne reader, measuring one lesion twice-17.8%+16.1%Two readers, measuring the same lesion-22.1%+25.4%Two readers, measuring change between scans-31.3%+30.3%
Range within which two measurements of the same lesion differ, 95% limits of agreement-40%-20%0%+20%+40%Progression: 20% growthResponse: 30% shrinkageOne reader, same lesion twice-17.8% to +16.1%Two readers, same lesion-22.1% to +25.4%Two readers, change between scans-31.3% to +30.3%
Show the numbers as a table
Pooled 95% limits of agreement, relative measurement difference (Yoon et al., Eur J Cancer 2016)
SituationLower limitUpper limit
One reader, measuring one lesion twice-17.8%+16.1%
Two readers, measuring the same lesion-22.1%+25.4%
Two readers, measuring change between scans-31.3%+30.3%
Yoon et al., Observer variability in RECIST-based tumour burden measurements, Eur J Cancer 2016
Shortfall of clinical radiologists in the UKFewer radiologists than needed to meet current demand
Shortfall of clinical radiologists in the UK0%10%20%30%40%50%29%202432%202540%2030, forecast
Shortfall of clinical radiologists in the UK0%10%20%30%40%50%29%202432%202540%2030 (forecast)
Show the numbers as a table
Shortfall of clinical radiologists, UK (Royal College of Radiologists)
YearShortfall
202429%
202532% (over 2,300 radiologists)
2030, forecast if no action40% (over 4,050)
Royal College of Radiologists, 2025 workforce census, published June 2026

Fewer people to read more scans.

The UK has 32% fewer radiologists than it needs, and without action the gap is forecast to reach 40% by 2030.

Every follow-up read that has to be done from scratch, finding and re-measuring each lesion by hand, competes for the same reporting time.

What a follow-up read asks of a radiologist.

The steps are simple to list. Done by hand, each one takes time and invites disagreement.

Find every lesion again

On a new scan with a different slice position, breathing and contrast timing.

Decide which is which

Match each lesion to the same one on the earlier scan, including ones that are new or gone.

Measure each one

Choose the slice and the axis, then measure, the same way as last time.

Work out the change

For each lesion and for the total, and decide what it means for treatment.

Work with us

We are looking for hospitals and research groups with baseline and follow-up CT of colorectal liver metastases, radiologists for a reader study, and academic and NHS partners for funded validation.

info@scanvero.co.uk

Please do not email patient images or patient information.